Why SoundCloud is Giving Away Their Audio Rights to Copyright Theft
I’m not sure about you, but I hate the SoundCloud audio downloaded feature. For a business that relies on its audio content to increase its sales, this is a real bummer.
On the surface, the use of the internet and technology can seem like a great thing for many businesses, such as online music sharing. The soundcloud app on an iPhone or iPod Touch is especially useful for social media sharing and community building; the point is the same as that of building friendships in general: the sharing of your ideas and content with the world.
for more info visit: ninja downloader
However, SoundCloud has chosen to make it difficult and convoluted. By requiring audio files are hosted on their servers, SoundCloud is taking away the ability for you to give your customers the best version of your recording.
It makes sense for SoundCloud to own the files, in that they can allow others to add to them, thus increasing the potential for revenue. The problem is, the company takes this very much for granted. They charge users who join the website for using their service, so it’s fairly obvious that these services would always have some kind of product to offer.
What about the musicians who want to sell their products through SoundCloud? With the copyright theft from SoundCloud, why should they? This is one of the main concerns raised by many musicians.
While I would never want to see the death of SoundCloud (they’ve had the foresight to build a network that will continue to thrive), I do believe that musicians have a responsibility to do whatever they can to avoid any conflict with the creators of SoundCloud. Since the inception of SoundCloud, musicians have been very successful selling their products through the website.
However, the streaming platform SoundCloud remains to be a valuable resource for many artists. They have done an excellent job helping many small and independent labels and artists to generate exposure and create buzz. But if musicians, recording artists, and songwriters need to host their audio files on SoundCloud’s servers, then this opens up a whole new can of worms.
It creates a situation where they’ll become a hub for piracy, by competing with labels for new clients. Music industry insiders have worried that SoundCloud is putting themselves at a competitive disadvantage with companies like YouTube, which not only hosts videos but can also post your audio file on their site without your permission.
It seems that the problem stems from SoundCloud’s decision to shut down accounts and begin their copyright infringement campaign. Because it seems like a digital equivalent of holding up a sign, they’re using copyright law to shut down accounts for sharing music. In reality, they’re making money with this tactic, and this tactic alone is reason enough for musicians to avoid using SoundCloud downloader.
Any attempt to find alternatives to the company will probably end up stalling when it comes to audio sharing between musicians and fans. Any musician or music business owner that tries to work with SoundCloud should be aware of this issue.
Why is SoundCloud doing this? Is it because they think they have a monopoly on music sharing?
Obviously, there’s something else going on. But what, and why?